POLICE CRIMINALITY

SHEET 3 Perjury as to Mr Ovenden's true state of health.

THIS INFORMATION WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO GRAHAM OVENDEN UNTIL AFTER THE TRIAL HAD TAKEN PLACE AND VERDICTS GIVEN.

The rumor of a suspected overdose (ie suicide) was fabricated by both Edmund Ovenden and the police who as you see above were well aware of the true nature of Graham Ovenden's malady. At the Bodmin Magestrates court the police representative argued strongly for Graham Ovenden to be held in custody and not given unsecured bail as he had tried to commit suicide and was therefore a danger to himself. This if it happened would give Edmund Ovenden ample time to carry on with his embezzelment of his father's property (also at this time he and Graham Ovenden's wife were seriously intending to move to the continent). It was obvious that the three magistrates hearing the case were suspicious of the police argument, and not a little sympathetic to Mr Nicholls appeal in the defendants cause, thus gave Graham Ovenden the unsecured bail as requested. The fact that this information was placed on the CND listing shows once more that the CPS arc not an independant reviewer of evidence. In fact it would not be unreasonable to accuse both parties, the police and CPS of conspiricy and also a most serious perjury. It is worth noting that if unsecured bail had not been granted to Mr Ovenden he would, no doubt, have languished in prison at the prosecution's pleasure until the final (third) trial took place. On past experience one may expect that proceedure to be tardy in the extreme!

Also it is probably worth noting that Elaine Hobson of the CPS, who incidently is the signature on all the police documents, was Quaifs (the prosecution Barrister) lover and involved with a scandalous episode between them that made national headlines. Food for thought, this episode, as to the impartiality of her CND listings!


SHEET 2 Childhood Streets

THE NON DISCLOSURE OF THIS IMPORTANT AND CELEBRATED PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY MAY WELL HAVE LED TO A CATASTROPHIC DESTRUCTION OF SIMILAR WORKS, INCLUDING THOSE OF CONSIDERABLE HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE.

The above document shows that the police were well aware of CHILDHOOD STREETS as early as 15/8/2011 and that they deliberately lied during the Roscoe hearing in denying the existence of the book..


SHEET 2B Childhood Streets

THE NON DISCLOSURE OF THIS IMPORTANT AND CELEBRATED PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY MAY WELL HAVE LED TO A CATASTROPHIC DESTRUCTION OF SIMILAR WORKS, INCLUDING THOSE OF CONSIDERABLE HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE.

Judge Roscoe argued that the 83 seperate images of Childhood Streets should not be destroyed as indecent (the strong wish of the police) as they were important historical documents and therefore not necessarily to be regarded as soley works of art. It would be hard to imagine how the image of the last working horse drawn coal cart in London (as seen right) comes under the description of 'indecent'!


SHEET 1 Marcus Adams

NON DISCLOSURE OF IMPORTANT HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS
RESTRICTED
POLICE SCHEDULE OF NON-SENSITIVE UNUSED MATERIAL
Form MG 6C Page 37 of 75
R v Graham Stuart OVENDEN The Disclosure Officer believes that the following material, which does not form part of the prosecution case, is NOT SENSITIVE
URN: 50BL/1062/2011


SHEET 1B Marcus Adams

THESE IMAGES TAKEN BY MARCUS ADAMS (REMEMBERING HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE FAMOUS PORTRAITS AND GROUP PHOTOGRAPHS OF THREE SUCCESSIVE MONARCHS AND THEIR CHILDREN) WOULD HAVE BEEN INVALUABLE TO THE DEFENCE TEAM AS IT SHOWS TO A JURY THE NORMALITY OF PAST (AND THUS PRESENT) IMAGES OF CHILDHOOD. IN FAILING TO DISCLOSE THESE AND NUMEROUS OTHER LIKE IMAGES WE CAN ONLY SEE A DELIBERATE FALSIFICATION OF SITUATION BY THE POLICE BUT EQUALLY SO, THAT OF THE CPS.